Kategori :

L@PAKK SOROTI DUGAAN PEMBOROSAN ANGGARAN 2025 DI BPKAD LAMPUNG TENGAH

Gunung Sugih – Lembaga Pemantau Kebijakan Publik (L@PAKK) melayangkan surat laporan kepada Kepala Badan Pengelola Keuangan dan Aset Daerah (BPKAD) Kabupaten Lampung Tengah terkait dugaan pemborosan anggaran serta pelanggaran tata kelola pengadaan barang dan jasa pada Tahun Anggaran 2025.

Dalam surat bernomor 1057/Sek/L@pakk/LPG/VI/2026 tersebut, L@PAKK mengungkap sejumlah temuan yang dinilai perlu mendapat perhatian dan pemeriksaan lebih lanjut oleh pihak berwenang.

Menurut laporan tersebut, belanja bahan cetakan pada tahun anggaran 2025 disebut mencapai Rp2.446.227.000 untuk 43 kegiatan. Selain itu, belanja alat tulis kantor tercatat sebesar Rp742.674.000 untuk 45 kegiatan, sedangkan belanja kertas dan cover menghabiskan anggaran Rp1.030.606.000 untuk 46 kegiatan.

Jika diakumulasikan, total anggaran untuk kebutuhan alat tulis, cetakan, kertas, dan cover di lingkungan BPKAD Lampung Tengah mencapai sekitar Rp4,2 miliar.

L@PAKK mempertanyakan besaran anggaran tersebut karena dinilai tidak sebanding dengan kebutuhan riil organisasi dan jumlah pegawai yang ada.

Dalam laporannya, lembaga tersebut menduga adanya mark up harga satuan pada sejumlah pengadaan barang dan jasa.

Selain itu, laporan juga menyoroti kegiatan pemeliharaan dapur dan kamar mandi yang dibagi menjadi dua paket pekerjaan. Paket pertama tercatat sebesar Rp250 juta untuk lantai satu, sedangkan paket kedua sebesar Rp225 juta untuk lantai dua.

Menurut L@PAKK, pemecahan pekerjaan tersebut diduga dilakukan untuk menghindari proses pengadaan yang seharusnya dilakukan melalui mekanisme lelang atau e-purchasing sesuai ketentuan yang berlaku. Lembaga tersebut menilai pekerjaan yang memiliki lokasi, jenis, dan tahun anggaran yang sama semestinya dilaksanakan dalam satu kesatuan paket pekerjaan.

Atas temuan tersebut, L@PAKK meminta agar dilakukan pemeriksaan dan klarifikasi terhadap penggunaan anggaran dimaksud guna memastikan pelaksanaan kegiatan telah sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku.

Hingga berita ini ditulis, pihak BPKAD Kabupaten Lampung Tengah belum memberikan keterangan resmi terkait laporan yang disampaikan oleh L@PAKK tersebut. (*)

17 thoughts on “L@PAKK SOROTI DUGAAN PEMBOROSAN ANGGARAN 2025 DI BPKAD LAMPUNG TENGAH

  1. Now feeling that this site is the kind I want to make sure does not disappear, and a look at thisdomainisabdu reinforced that quiet protective feeling, the rare sites whose disappearance would actually matter to me are the sites I want to support through return visits and recommendations and this one has joined that small protected list.

  2. Skipped the related links section thinking I had read enough and then came back to it later when curiosity got the better of me, and a stop at tasseltract confirmed I should have just read it first, every section of this site appears to deserve careful attention rather than skipping past lazily.

  3. Liked the way the post balanced confidence and humility, and a stop at stridertorch maintained the same balance, knowing when to assert and when to acknowledge uncertainty is a sign of mature thinking and the writers here have clearly developed that calibration through what I assume is years of careful work on their craft.

  4. Reading this triggered a small change in how I think about the topic going forward, and a stop at siskatrance reinforced that subtle shift, the rare content that actually moves my thinking rather than just confirming or filling it is the kind I most value and this site is providing that kind of impact today.

  5. Liked the way the post balanced confidence and humility, and a stop at tweedvolume maintained the same balance, knowing when to assert and when to acknowledge uncertainty is a sign of mature thinking and the writers here have clearly developed that calibration through what I assume is years of careful work on their craft.

  6. Generally my comment to other readers about new sites is to wait and see but for this one I would jump to recommend now, and a look at vesseltame reinforced that early recommendation, the speed at which a site earns my recommendation is itself a quality signal and this one has earned mine quickly clearly.

  7. Picked this post to share in a Slack channel where I knew it would be appreciated, and a look at singersorbet suggested I will share more from here later, content worth sharing into a professional context is content that has earned a higher kind of trust than mere personal interest and this site has it.

  8. The headings made navigating the post simple even when I needed to find a specific section quickly, and a look at swansignal continued the same thoughtful structure, small details like clear headings show that someone is actually thinking about how the reader uses the page rather than just filling it for length alone.

  9. Found this via a link from another piece I was reading and the click was worth it, and a stop at waferturtle extended the value across more material, the open web still rewards clicking through citations when the underlying writers care about each other work and this site clearly belongs to that network.

  10. Most blog writing on this subject reaches for the same handful of arguments and this post avoided them, and a look at starlitvixen continued the original treatment, content that finds its own path through territory other writers have flattened is content with real authorial energy and this site has plenty of that distinctive energy.

  11. Will be passing this along to a few people who would benefit from the perspective shared here, and a stop at trenchtwist only added to what I will be sharing, this kind of generous content deserves to circulate widely rather than getting buried in some search engine algorithm tweak that pushes it down the rankings.

  12. The lack of unnecessary jargon made the post accessible without sacrificing accuracy, and a look at slackvista continued in the same accessible style, technical topics often hide behind specialised vocabulary but here the writer trusts the reader to keep up with plain language and that trust pays off nicely throughout the entire post.

  13. Took the time to read the comments on this post too and they were also worth reading, and a stop at tapetoken suggested the community quality matches the content quality, when the conversation around a piece is as good as the piece itself you know you have found a real corner of the internet.

  14. Reading this in the gap between work projects was a small but meaningful break, and a stop at straitsurge extended that gentle reset, content that provides genuine refreshment rather than just distraction during work breaks is content with a particular kind of utility and this site fits that role for me reliably during work days.

  15. Such writing is increasingly rare and worth supporting through attention, and a stop at tritonstyle extended that supportive attention across more pages, the conscious choice to spend time on sites that produce careful work rather than convenient consumption is itself a small form of patronage and this site is receiving that conscious patronage from me.

  16. The conclusions felt earned rather than tacked on at the end like an afterthought, and a look at sampleshadow kept that careful structure going, you can tell when a writer has thought about the shape of their post versus just letting it ramble out and hoping for the best at the end which most do.

  17. Appreciated that the writer trusted the reader to follow along without constant restating of earlier points, and a look at syruptarot continued that respect for the reader, treating an audience as capable adults rather than as people to be hand held through every paragraph is something I notice and value highly across the open internet today.

Tinggalkan Balasan

Alamat email Anda tidak akan dipublikasikan. Ruas yang wajib ditandai *